The 1918 flu was so devastating that its society could not figure out how to verbalize it, and submerged it instead.
We are now in the worst epidemic since 1918. With no historical model, how can we learn how to make sense of now?
My
dad fought in World War II and all my long life with him, I only
heard three or four humorous stories that had little or nothing to do
with actual war. World War II has been extensively documented, but
with few exceptions (Ken Burns, for instance) the personal experience
is gone. So too in the case of the inaccurately-named Spanish Flu.
So
will this happen again? Will the new world contain few hints of the
tectonic shift that created it? Will it disappear in one or more
important ways?
I
don't think so. So much has changed since 1919, since 1945.
Everyone writes – or “verbalizes,” in McKenna's words –
about everything now (even, apparently, me). What I am more
concerned about is: which story will be told? There's obviously the
choice between the stories that will be told by the bitterly divided
political factions in the US. But we'll also have the different
stories told in each country around the world, stories that differ
because of ideology, certainly, but also because of perspective,
experience, level of coping skills, distance from the crisis, age,
status, and etcetera. And then there are the stories told by the
numbers, which have been inexact – apparently, not even close – since
the beginning, and continue to be. The numbers will tell stories
about the various motivations of those who assembled the numbers, but
will not be able to tell stories (not accurate ones, anyway) about
how many of us were struck down.
Will
the true, personal stories survive?
Will
a young frontline doctor or nurse who worked tirelessly through the
crisis days in New York City or Wuhan or Moderna tell their children their
story, twenty years later, or will they say, “There was this funny
thing that happened in the break room...”
No comments:
Post a Comment