One
option, of course, is no change. New cases and deaths are reduced
to very manageable levels; the virus falls from the front page,
little by little, and we look around and realize that the whole world
is just like it was before. Institutions rebuilt or unchanged;
health systems unimproved; financial markets rebounded; climate
change chugging along. No real change in the way the world works.
I
forgot who said “Don't let a good disaster go to waste,” meaning that
when a crisis upends everything, you've got a chance to put it back
together differently. It would be a shame if, say, December of 2020
was indistinguishable from December of 2019.
It
seems there are two ways the New World can come about – one is the
result of changes which are unavoidable (greater national debt; some
disruption in public school and higher education; some small
businesses dying), and the other way is to plan and execute change in
a purposeful way.
I
can think of a whole lot of the latter. For instance, we can expand
and incorporate many of the changes already in place: guaranteed
income; online learning; extension of sick leave to employees who
have never had it; less unnecessary travel; reduction in consumerism;
widely expanding the opportunity to work from home. Make these
temporary measures permanent, to the extent it is in the best
interests of the most people.
Most,
if not all, of these changes will be phased out when the virus fades
away if no one makes the effort to make them a permanent part of our
culture and our economy. It will be interesting to see who rises to
the challenge.